<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saturday Post. . .</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themotaxguy.com/saturday-post-oct-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themotaxguy.com/saturday-post-oct-4/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=saturday-post-oct-4</link>
	<description>Tax Preparation and your Personal Finances</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 15:48:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://themotaxguy.com/saturday-post-oct-4/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 01:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lrtaxprep.com/blog/?p=717#comment-96</guid>
		<description>The following is a copy of the finial information, and of coarse what was still missing.

&quot;That is my kind of read.  It is on the $$.  The father does receive social security $18,000 a year.  the wife is only 59 and does not receive SS.  The children do receive social security of $400 a month.  But thank you and your expression &quot;outside of the box&quot; is the correct attitude.  And I believe that the online programs don&#039;t allow it.  And I believe that the preparers in the VITA/AARP program don&#039;t know how ( I did do tax returns for that program in the year of 2006 for 2005 tax returns when we had a large contingent of National Guard called up.  And I believe there are too many preparers in too many firms including HRB that do not think &quot;outside of the box&quot;

I felt that your various readers that find themselves posting comments did not appreciate my input and just as soon that I left the scene,  two of them said it is time to &quot;move on&quot;

I thank you for the two emails and I will continue, as you, to provide a service helping the American Citizen to pay the lowest tax they legally owe, or the largest refund legally entitled.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following is a copy of the finial information, and of coarse what was still missing.</p>
<p>&#8220;That is my kind of read.  It is on the $$.  The father does receive social security $18,000 a year.  the wife is only 59 and does not receive SS.  The children do receive social security of $400 a month.  But thank you and your expression &#8220;outside of the box&#8221; is the correct attitude.  And I believe that the online programs don&#8217;t allow it.  And I believe that the preparers in the VITA/AARP program don&#8217;t know how ( I did do tax returns for that program in the year of 2006 for 2005 tax returns when we had a large contingent of National Guard called up.  And I believe there are too many preparers in too many firms including HRB that do not think &#8220;outside of the box&#8221;</p>
<p>I felt that your various readers that find themselves posting comments did not appreciate my input and just as soon that I left the scene,  two of them said it is time to &#8220;move on&#8221;</p>
<p>I thank you for the two emails and I will continue, as you, to provide a service helping the American Citizen to pay the lowest tax they legally owe, or the largest refund legally entitled.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: themotaxguy.com @ 2012-05-21 13:35:50 -->
