Posts Tagged federal income tax

Five Filing Facts for Recently Married or Divorced Taxpayers

(Having your name on your SS Card match is a growing issue. This could help.)

           If you were married or divorced recently, there are a couple of things you’ll want to do to ensure the name on your tax return matches the name registered with the Social Security Administration.

           Here are five facts from the IRS for recently married or divorced taxpayers. Following these steps will help avoid problems when you file your tax return.

Click to continue reading “Five Filing Facts for Recently Married or Divorced Taxpayers”

Tags: federal income tax, status, tax planning

A brief overview of the alternative minimum tax (AMT).

Snoopy at the typewriter          The Alternative Minimum Tax (or AMT) is an extra tax some people have to pay on top of their regular income tax. Okay that sounds pretty messed up, doesn’t it?

          In recent years, the AMT has been under increased attention. Why? Well, put simply, because the AMT is not cataloged or set up for inflation, thus because of recent tax cuts, an increasing number of middle-income taxpayers have been finding themselves subject to this tax. Until recently, the AMT affected less than 1% of all individual taxpayers. However, since the year 2000, the AMT has steadily grown, hitting roughly 3% of all taxpayers in 2005.  Moreover, if left unchanged, the AMT will penalize nearly 20% of taxpayers by 2010. Almost 95% of all married filing joint couples. 

          The number of taxpayers affected by the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) is expected to exceed 30 million in 2010. Now that is really messed up. 

Click to continue reading “A brief overview of the alternative minimum tax (AMT).”

Tags: AMT, federal income tax, History, taxable income, Taxes

Righteousness in Designation?

            Friday I was interviewed and retained by a new client. This particular client has several issues that actually can fall in line with a great debate we have all been following.           

First, a little background:

             A young newly wedded (three years) couple has their tax return done by “pros” as they are not among those who follow the taxing world. We will call them Pat and Jody Taxpayer. Having just started their own Business they left HeRBert (the group who prepared their returns) for what to them was perceived as a tax professional. They retained a CPA to handle some general bookkeeping and complete tax returns. 

Good choice? 

Of course it is, “All but the militantly nefarious and hopelessly deluded concede that CPAs are experts at keeping books and records. There simply is no higher accounting “designation.” then CPA

            The CPA (Certified Public Accountant) maintained records by gaining access to Pat & Jody’s bank account using the online statements. The first tax season for this CPA came around and she completed the 2007 tax return. Another year passed, and she completed the 2008 return.

            Several months ago, the IRS notified the Taxpayers that the 2007 return was under investigation. Seven lines on two different Schedule Cs were in Question. 

            Considering a CPA had prepared this return there should be no worries. 

So how did I get this return?

            When the time came for the audit with the “Tax Compliance Officer”, the CPA, had manufactured information to provide the IRS to validate two of the seven lines in question and did not show up to guide the Taxpayers through the 3 ½ hour long ordeal. Needless to say, the IRS found no substantial proof or validation for seven lines in question. P & J now are holding a bill from the IRS for over $10,000.00.

Not only are the taxpayers confused about what happened, but the “Compliance Officer” also looked at their 2008 return, they are about to undergo another audit. 

“Because good accounting skills are a critical part of good tax preparation, CPAs are uniquely qualified to be tax preparers.” 

So where is this CPA? Avoiding Pat and Jody. 

This is a most uniquely “qualified” tax preparer?

I reviewed 2006 (again prepared by HeRBert – a fast food chain preparation service), 2007 and 2008 returns. (again, these two returns were prepared by the same “CPA”)

  • 2006 had 6 errors resulting in a $213 refund to Pat and Judy (I can say this because I have already amended this return)
  • 2007 has 21 errors - three missing forms (associated with errors) and if that wasn’t bad enough, 5 of the errors are mathematical.

“Good tax preparation is about numbers. It’s about keeping good books and records.

In short, it’s about good accounting.

In fact, what is a tax return if it’s not an accounting?”

                                    Hummmmm

if anyone needs a definition to “accounting” I have a link to the right for Merriam-Webster Dictionary or you can click this.

Good thing it doesn’t suggest an ability to add or subtract.

Same for Accountant

  • 2008, well is just wrong. I say this because nothing changed from 2007 through 2008.
  • 2007 consisted of
    • 1040 Long Form
    • 2 Schedule Cs

What the 2008 return consisted of was a 1040A – Short Form, nothing more.

My conclusion is this CPA stands proudly among those who are truly CPA tax professionals. You real CPAs who are tax pros, give her credibility she assuredly doesn’t need. 

As for Jody and Pat, luckily they found a tax professional. I will help them through the amended returns, the audit up coming, and any and all IRS intervention that may come their way. If you wish to stay updated on their situation, I will create a blog page giving more detail information and will keep it updated.

 However not all of you will see it this way. Why? Well, I am no longer a CPA. I am not an EA, nor am I an Attorney. What does this make me? I am an unenrolled preparer. 

Unenrolled preparers, by definition, have no recognized credentials and are bound by no professional standards 

And what are the unique qualifications of an unenrolled preparer? 

Would someone please tell me? 

Anyone? 

The silence is deafening. 

That’s because the answer is “none . . . nada . . . zero . . . zilch.” 

The silence sir, is deafening because you are on your computer. But now, please, open your eyes fully, adjust your glasses, I want you to hear me plainly. 

An unenrolled preparer is a unique person. Like a Lawyer, a CPA, or Doctor or any other profession, you are going to have unqualified hacks. My Credentials are useless in the taxing industry. 

Or did you miss it?

The AICPA told a CPA/Tax Professional “We do not offer a credential in taxation. In general, our approach has been not to develop credential programs around areas for which the public already believes CPAs to ‘own’. In addition, we do not endorse a particular tax credential.” 

An unenrolled preparer sees how others take advantage of the miss-conceptions of the designation and learns tax rules and regs to help people through what can be a very taxing time (no pun intended). 

I question your thinking when you say a man with over 35 years in the tax preparation industry has no credibility. I only have 23 so I must not have any either?

Hummmm, let’s look at my background a bit:

a)      A Masters in Accounting

b)      Formally employed by this countries (at the time) Largest Accounting firms

c)      Formally a CPA

d)     23 years preparing returns for taxpayers

Of the four listed in my mind, only qualifies me to call myself a tax professional. I can assure you it isn’t one of the top three. 

“There simply is no higher accounting designation.” 

Thus, if the Internal Revenue Code imposes an affirmative duty on taxpayers to maintain good books and records, doesn’t that alone explain why CPAs are uniquely qualified to prepare tax returns and why many CPAs are drawn to the field of tax preparation? 

Of course it does.” 

            You Pompous arrogant ass. Is your head so high in the sky that you are not getting enough oxygen?

            True enough, the IRC does affirm duty to taxpayers to maintain good and accurate records. Alone that tells me (a former CPA) should seek advice from a CPA on how to keep those records not how or where to put them on a tax return.

            It is my opinion that a good majority of the CPAs that are drawn to taxation and preparation do so for the money. 

            (Not to get off subject, but are you actually a licensed Tax Attorney, and a CPA? I know a few Lawyers and I’ll have to ask, to be sure, but I think like the AICP, there is nothing out there for Lawyers to hold actual “tax” credentials. If I am wrong please correct me, do you have some designation that says you’re a Tax Lawyer? If so, what is it? 

             As for not being bound by professional standards, I find it hard to understand why I have to point out to a designated pro that we (The Unenrolled prepares) are bound by the same rules in Circular 230 as you are. Maybe you should read it some time.

            A while back, I post Who is: a post that defines different titles. If you want to see the entire post please click on the link Who is: Below is a brief recap: 

A Tax Attorney - Typically large and even small businesses will meet with a tax attorney once every quarter or once a year to ensure that they are making the best possible business choices with regards to investments and tax issues. Since the taxation, laws change constantly. 

A Bookkeeper – is responsible for keeping accurate, up-to-date business records for proper cash flow management, balance sheet preparation, and developing expansion and investment plans. 

Accountants – keep track of a company’s money. 

Enrolled Agent – is a federally authorized tax practitioner who has technical expertise in the field of taxation and who is empowered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury to represent taxpayers before all administrative levels of the Internal Revenue Service for audits, collections, and appeals.

 

Tax Preparer – an individual who prepares tax returns.

 

Other post from the “taxguy” blog that may be related to the taxpayer issue mentioned in this post.

Choosing the Right Representative

Choosing a tax preparer. . .

5 Worst Things You Can Do if You Get an IRS Collection Notice a Guest post from Peter Pappas. . .

More on “finding a pro”. . .

Everybody hates an Audit. . .

Audit Avoidance

How to Avoid IRS Penalties and Interest

Top tax savers

Your Rights as a Taxpayer

Picking A CPA With Too Much. . .

Tags: accounting practices, Audits, federal income tax, filing tax returns, honest mistake, hot topic, My thoughts, Opinions, preparing taxes, professional services, red flag, Tax Information, Tax Obligations, Tax Preparation, Tax preparer, tax preparers, Tax professional, tax professionals, tax pros, tax representative, tax situation, types of audits, Your responsable

The Truth About Paying Fewer Taxes.

             I read a lot about the taxing world. Often I am searchingto find books to recommend to my clients to give them a better understanding how a tax return works and what is needed to make it work best and what they can do to minimize their liability. The Truth About Paying Fewer Taxes is by far the best book I have ever come across to accomplish just that.

 

The Truth About Paying Fewer Taxes is a book with “52 Truths” about taxes. It plainly answers questions like ”do you have to file?”, to “when?”, to figuring out just what is taxable all the way through to retirement. Also covering Compliance, Audits, and Special Tax Situations The Truth About Paying Fewer Taxes will give you a better understanding of taxes, thus giving you what you need to cut your taxes.

 

            The Truth About Paying Fewer Taxes, is a book written by Kay Bell. Kay is a fellow tax blogger (Don’t Mess With Taxes, Taxes: Eye on the IRS), She helped create Bankrate.com’s tax channel and continues to be a major contributor to Bankrate’s Tax Guide. I have had occasion to talk with Kay on the phone, and I communicate regularly with her via Twitter.

 

Kay’s writing is beautiful and gentile, like reading a great novel.

 

You can see a full list of the 52 truths just by looking at Barnes and Nobel’s Feature tab for The Truth About Paying Fewer Taxes Each one of the truths is explained in detail and in plain language, so you can save money and understand why you’re saving money.

 

I have been recommending this book to every one of my clients, and will continue to do so from now on.

 

I have a signed copy (yes, signed by Kay Bell the author) of The Truth About Paying Fewer Taxes and will be giving it away here.

 

How to enter:

 

Each of the following will count as one entry for a chance to win.

Please read the Contest Terms below.

ü  Leave a comment on this post stating how you prepared or will prepare your taxe return. (self, fast-food chain, CPA, software, free-file, Other-please describe)

ü  Subscribe to my RSS feed and leave a comment below to let me know you did so, or

ü  Subscribe to my email feed leave a comment here using the same email address with which you subscribed. (this will gain you two entries for the drawing)

ü  Blog about this contest and link back here from your blog. (Leave me a comment and link to your blog post here to let me know.)

ü  Follow me on twitter – @bruce_taxguy. Leave a comment here with your twitter username.

ü  Tweet about this contest and leave a comment to let me know you did so.

 

Bonus Entries: Leave comments on other posts on this blog. If you’re new to taxguy, visit earlier posts. The comment(s) must show some thought and not just “I agree” or “Great idea.” Come back to this post and let me know which post(s) you commented on. Each approved comment will gain you an additional entry.

 

Contest Terms

Ø  The contest begins now and ends at 11:59PM EST on March 17th, 2009. Comments to this post will be closed at that time.

Ø  1 winner will be randomly selected using a random integer generator at random.org.

Ø  I will contact the winner via the email address used to comment here.

Ø  The winner will have 3 days to respond with necessary contact information for mailing prize. (I will send a 2nd notification email after 2 days if we have not heard back.)

Ø  If the winner does not respond after 4 days, a new winner will be selected from remaining entrants.

Prize Terms

While I will do my best to ensure proper delivery of the winners autographed copy of The Truth About Paying Fewer Taxes, I am not liable for non-delivery due to:

 

v  Incorrect mailing and contact information provided by the winner

v  Loss or error on the part of the postal service or delivery personnel

v  Any other matter beyond my control

Tags: blog, compliance audits, contest terms, Deductions, federal income tax, filing tax returns, Income tax, irs, Review, saving money, status, Tax professional, tax professionals, tax return, tax situations, Taxes, taxpayers

Are You sure you are Having Enough Withheld?

How are you supposed to know? This is a re-post for your tax planning needs. A few easy steps and some light planning can help you figure this out.

What you need to know:

            If you fail to estimate your federal income tax withholding properly, it may cost you in a variety of ways. If you receive an income tax refund, it essentially means that you provided the IRS with an interest-free loan during the year. By comparison, if you owe taxes when you file your return, you may have to scramble for cash at tax time–and possibly owe interest and penalties to the IRS as well.

            When determining the correct withholding amount for your salary or wages, your objective should be to have just enough taxes withheld to prevent you from incurring penalties when your tax return is due. (You may owe some money at the time you file your return, but it shouldn’t be much.) You can accomplish this by reading and understanding IRS Publication 505 and IRS Publication 919, properly completing Form W-4 (and accompanying worksheets), and providing an updated Form W-4 to your employer when your circumstances change significantly.

 

Form W-4 helps you determine the proper withholding amount

Two factors determine the amount of income tax that your employer withholds from your regular pay:

1)            the amount you earn

2)            the information you provide on Form W-4.

This form asks you for three pieces of information:

1)      The number of withholding allowances you want to claim: You can claim up to the maximum number you’re entitled to, claim less than you’re entitled to, or claim zero.

2)      Whether you want taxes to be withheld at the single or married rate: The married status, which is associated with a lower withholding rate, should generally be selected only by those taxpayers who are married and file a joint return. Other people (including those who are married and file separately) should generally have taxes withheld at the higher, single rate.

3)      The additional amount (if any) you want withheld from your paycheck: This is optional; you can specify any additional amount of money you want withheld.

 

When both spouses work and have taxes withheld at the married rate, they sometimes end up with insufficient taxes withheld. If this happens to you, remember that you can always choose to withhold at the single rate. In addition, you can determine the proper withholding amount by completing Form W-4’s two-earner/two-job worksheet.

 

Complete the worksheets to claim the correct number of allowances

To understand Form W-4, you must understand allowances.

 

Think of allowances as cash in your pocket at the time that you receive your paycheck. The more allowances you claim, the less taxes are taken from your paycheck (and the more cash ends up in your pocket on payday).

The following factors determine your number of allowances:

1.      The number of personal and dependency exemptions that you claim on your federal income tax return

2.      The number of jobs that you work

3.      The deductions, adjustments to income, and credits that you expect to take during the year

4.      Your filing status

5.      Whether your spouse works

 

To claim the correct number of allowances, you should complete Form W-4’s worksheets. These include a personal allowances worksheet, a deductions and adjustments worksheet, and a two-earner/two-job worksheet. IRS Publication 505 (Tax Withholding and Estimated Tax) explains these worksheets.

 

Check your withholding

To avoid surprises at tax time, it’s a good idea to periodically check your withholding. If you accurately complete all Form W-4 worksheets and don’t have significant non-wage income (e.g., interest and dividends), it’s likely that your employer will withhold an amount close to the tax you’ll owe on your return. But in the following cases, accurate completion of the Form W-4 worksheets alone won’t guarantee that you’ll have the correct amount of tax withheld:

 

1)      When you’re married and both spouses work,

2)      If either of you start or stop working

3)      When you or your spouse are working more than one job

4)      When you have significant non-wage income, such as interest, dividends, alimony, unemployment compensation, or self-employment income, or the amount of your non-wage income changes

5)      When you’ll owe other taxes on your return, such as self-employment tax or household employment tax

6)      When you have a lifestyle change (e.g., marriage, divorce, birth or adoption of a child, new home, retirement) that affects the tax deductions or credits you may claim

7)      When there are tax law changes that affect the amount of tax you’ll owe

 

In these cases, IRS Publication 919 (How Do I Adjust My Tax Withholding?) can help you compare the total tax that you’ll withhold for the year with the tax that you expect to owe on your return. It can also help you determine any additional amount you may need to withhold from each paycheck to avoid owing taxes when you file your return. Alternatively, it may help you identify if you’re having too much tax withheld. If you find that you need to make changes to your withholding, you can do so at any time simply by submitting a new Form W-4 to your employer.

Tags: circumstances, Deductions, federal income tax, Forms, income, income tax withholding, irs, status, tax planning, tax time, Taxes, taxpayers, withholding, withholding allowances, Withholdings

Guest Post Robert D. Flach – the internet’s “Wandering Tax Pro”

This is another addition to the series “Mistakes made when choosing a paid tax preparer”.

MISTAKES MADE WHEN CHOOSING A PAID TAX PREPARER

by Robert D Flach – the internet’s “Wandering Tax Pro”

I have been professionally preparing 1040s for individuals in all walks of life since February of 1972. In my opinion the two biggest mistakes a taxpayer can make when choosing a tax preparer are –

· Assuming that because a person has the initials “CPA” after his name he is an expert when it comes to federal and state income taxes.

· Assuming that H+R Block (or other chains such as Jackson Hewitt or Liberty) will charge a reduced, or even reasonable, fee for preparing your tax return.


1) The CPA designation means that a person took a very difficult test at the beginning of his/her career, possibly many, many years ago, only a small part of which dealt with federal income tax. It is no guarantee that he/she is current on federal and state tax law.


Whenever I get a new client I ask to see the last three (3) years’ tax returns, to make sure I do not miss any carry-forwards and to see if there are any errors that I could correct on an amended return. In my 35+ years of preparing tax returns I have found more mistakes on 1040s prepared by CPAs than by any other class of preparer, including the taxpayer himself.


Many, many, many years ago I was a “para-professional” in the Small Business Services Department of one of the then “Big Eight” accounting firms. While reviewing the prior year’s federal and state tax returns of a client whose current returns I was preparing I found a very obvious error on the state tax return that caused the client to pay much more tax than necessary. Under the firm’s policy, the return, which had been originally prepared by a CPA, was reviewed by his “manager” (also a CPA), and signed-off on by the head of the department (a CPA) and a member of the Tax Department (a CPA). Not one of these CPAs picked up the obvious error!

A student in one of the tax planning/preparation courses I taught at local adult schools also many, many years ago asked me what was the difference between a tax return prepared by a CPA and one prepared by me (I am obviously not a CPA). My answer was “at least $100.00″ (that number needs to be adjusted for inflation!).


FYI – the only initials that have any meaning when it comes to tax preparation are “EA” – Enrolled Agent (I am also not an “EA”). The name is misleading. An EA is not an agent of the Internal Revenue Service, but a private tax professional who is “enrolled” to act as a taxpayer’s “agent” in proceedings with the IRS and in tax court. To become an Enrolled Agent one must pass a difficult test that is 100% federal tax law. In order to maintain their enrolled status, EAs must have a mandatory number of continuing education credits in taxation each year.

2) When my mentor and I got a hold of the H+R Block fee schedule back in the late 1980s we were in complete shock. Henry and Richard ain’t cheap! In my opinion they are very expensive, especially considering the value of the service provided. They charge gourmet restaurant prices for fast food service! Plus they will attempt to squeeze even more money out of you by trying to push you into a usurious “Refund Anticipation Loan” or to make your IRA contribution to a Block-sponsored high-fee, low-yield investment that is practically guaranteed to lose money.

It appears that H+R has to charge outrageous fees in order to pay the costs of the many legal settlements and court judgments they have been faced with over the years.


There are a multitude of reasons why you should not have your tax return prepared by representatives of Henry and Richard or other firms of their ilk. Their excessive fee is only one. Returns prepared by commercial chains, particularly H+R, are second to CPAs in terms of errors I have discovered on 1040s over the years. My mentor always said that he wished H+R Block would move next door to our office – we would make a fortune fixing their mistakes!


A couple of years ago the Government Accountability Office (GAO) conducted a study which resulted in a report to Congress titled “Paid Return Preparers: In a Limited Study, Chain Preparers Made Serious Errors”. The GAO sent undercover agents with two different tax scenarios to a total of 19 offices of 5 “fast-food” commercial tax chains, including H+R Block, in a metropolitan area. In only 2 instances was the correct refund calculated, but all 19 returns contained errors. A similar undercover operation was conducted this past February and March by the office of the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) with similar results.

To be perfectly fair, over the years I have come across CPAs who actually knew their “stuff” when it came to income taxes, and even some who charged somewhat reasonable fees. Several of my fellow tax bloggers have the initials CPA after their name, and, judging by their blogs, they certainly are knowledgeable, quite savvy in fact, in federal income taxes. But in my experience these are the exception that proves the rule. And I am sure that there are probably a couple of competent, ethical and professional H+R Block preparers out there somewhere, too – although you couldn’t prove it by me.


While it may actually be possible that the best tax preparer, at the best price, for your particular situation is either a CPA or an H+R Block employee, this is only because of the education, experience, ability, temperament, and other factors that are specific to that individual preparer.

Here are some other mistakes to avoid when choosing a tax preparer –

* Do not use a tax preparer who guarantees you a bigger refund, or who guarantees a refund period. No tax preparer anywhere can guarantee you a refund if your individual facts and circumstances – your actual numbers – do not warrant a refund unless he/she makes up deductions or exemptions or purposely does not report all your income. Either way that is tax fraud! The only claim or guarantee any legitimate tax preparer can make is that by using his/her services you will pay the absolute least amount of federal and state income taxes possible for your individual situation.

* Do not choose a preparer who charges as his/her fee a percentage of your refund or of the amount of tax he/she has saved you. Chances are the person will illegally inflate your refund or savings to increase his/her fee. The fee for preparing a tax return should be based solely on the amount of time involved and/or the number of forms and schedules required.

* Do not choose a tax preparer solely for the reason that he/she tells you that you can walk out of the office with a check in your hand. That person or firm is not selling competent and accurate tax preparation – they are selling usurious Refund Anticipation Loans, which you should avoid anyway (but that is the subject of another post). You want to use a tax preparer that is experienced and knowledgeable in tax law and not a loan shark.

* Do not choose a tax preparer who will not sign your finished returns. All tax preparers are required by the IRS to sign all tax returns which they have been paid to prepare. If a person prepares your return and refuses to sign it you should refuse to pay him/her and take your “stuff” elsewhere.

* Do not choose a “box” as your tax preparer. I cannot stress this strongly enough – no tax preparation software is a substitute for knowledge of the Tax Code. And no tax preparation software is a substitute for the services of a trained tax professional! As with any software program the rule is “garbage in – garbage out”. And when the IRS comes after you for errors on your tax return you can’t blame it on the software – the US Tax Court has on two separate occasions rejected the “Turbo-Tax Defense”. The IRS estimates that do-it-yourself software users spend an average of 10 to over 20 hours longer on a return than if they used a paid tax preparer, depending on complexity of the return. The bottom line is – if you don’t know what you are doing do not rely on a tax preparation software package to make up for your lack of tax knowledge. Using a real live tax professional will save you time, aggravation and money.

When looking for a tax professional, as with any other professional, it is best to get a referral from a trusted friend or relative.

TTFN

COPYRIGHT © 2008 BY ROBERT D FLACH

Get $50 Cash Back Bonus with the Discover® More Card!

Thanks Robert for the guest post. For more from THE WONDERING TAX PRO be sure to visit his blog daily. I do.

Again, I want to invite any and all guest post on this subject. I want to hear from all bloggers or just readers with their own input. Let’s see what you see I am missing. If you have some words of wisdom on this subject please let us share it with everyone, if it is something that has already been covered, so what, I am looking for others to tell what they know or have learned about finding a paid preparer. Repetition drives the point home.

Tags: Deductions, federal income tax, irs, mistake, Opinions, Tax preparer, Taxes, taxpayers

A compromise. . .

“A compromise is the art of dividing a cake in such a way that everyone believes that he has got the biggest piece.”

- Dr. Ludwig Erhard

            I recently read the above and gave a great deal of thought to this.

With the study recently done by the Government Accountability Office, in any given year at least 60% of U.S. corporations surveyed paid no federal income tax, for the years of the study, 1998 to 2005. This reported by TAXGIRL in her post More Than Half of US Companies Pay No Income Tax. This is very interesting.

            The nation has been screaming for a fair tax system throughout history. (Remember the Boston tea Party?) Sooner or later there will be a revolt again, and studies like this are going to help incite such a thing.

            Where am I going with this? No where really. It just seems that more of us should think about what is going on. Our cost on, everything have gone up, we work and we pay our taxes. There is a system in place that mandates that corporations pay income tax. They have their rules and then there are rules that govern us, the working people of this country.

            Any business has the ability that if it has a good year, it can offset its taxable income from losses it faced in a bad year. NOL allows a company to deduct losses generated in previous years, in a current year. However, an individual is not allowed to carry forward federal income tax losses. In other words, if an individual has a bad year, the loss is wiped clean.

            I’m not suggesting a revolt by any means but how is this fair? If you earn income pay your taxes. A big advertising scheme by a lot of different folks is one announcing the complexity of the IRC (Internal Revenue Code). Does it really need to be so complex? I think not. However I don’t agree with the flat rate tax either. Too much goes on in life.

            I have clients that still rent. If they decide to buy a home (and they are planning for such) it would be imposable if there was a flat tax. So there needs to be cuts for this and that. Relief for different situations. If one entity is allowed to do something, so should we all.

            One of the biggest reasons I got into tax preparation was my desire to level the playing field somewhat. What I mean by this, is everyone deserves a fair share but not everyone knows how to get there. Corporate America (and around the world) gets breaks that would just make a person tax payer want to picket, something. There are a lot of rules and slides on rules that can help with your preparation and lower your tax bill. But with politics dictating that middle America pays the majority of the taxes then I say we need to change things.

            Corporate America has the biggest piece of the cake, we should have ours, you should have yours.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tags: compromise, Deductions, federal income tax, History, Opinions, taxable income, Taxes

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline

The Missouri "taxguy" is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache